A high-level committee headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently met to choose the new Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) and a Vigilance Commissioner. As a statutory member of this panel, Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi attended the meeting — and formally recorded his dissent.
Why Rahul Gandhi objected
According to sources familiar with the process, Rahul Gandhi raised several concerns before the committee, including:
1. Lack of transparency in shortlisting
Gandhi reportedly stated that the list of candidates and the criteria used for selection were not shared in advance. He argued that appointments to institutions like the CIC and CVC must follow a process that is transparent, predictable, and open to scrutiny.
2. Insufficient time to evaluate candidates
He is understood to have expressed that the panel was given very limited time to study the profiles of shortlisted applicants. For posts that demand high integrity and independence, he insisted that members should get adequate time to assess each candidate’s qualifications.
3. Need for stronger, independent institutions
Gandhi also emphasised that the CIC and the Central Vigilance Commission are meant to act as watchdogs, not extensions of the government. He argued that the selection process must guarantee independence so that the institutions can function without political influence.
4. Concerns about weakening of RTI framework
In the context of the CIC appointment, Gandhi pointed out that the Right to Information framework has already seen reduced autonomy in recent years. He said that appointing individuals without a robust consultation process may further weaken the system.
How the panel proceeded
Despite his dissent, the majority of the committee — which includes the Prime Minister and the Home Minister — moved forward with the final selections. The recommendations will now be sent for formal approval, after which the new CIC and Vigilance Commissioner will take charge.
Why this matters
Appointments to the CIC and CVC affect:
-
Transparency in government
-
Anti-corruption oversight
-
Independence of statutory bodies
-
Public trust in constitutional processes
Rahul Gandhi’s dissent highlights a growing debate about whether appointments to top institutions are being conducted in a way that ensures accountability and fairness.
The Media Times – Unfiltered. Unbiased. Unstoppable.
The Media Times stands as a pillar of fearless journalism, committed to delivering raw, unfiltered, and unbiased news. In a world saturated with noise, we cut through the clutter, bringing facts to the forefront without agenda or compromise.From hard-hitting investigative reports to thought-provoking analysis, we cover politics, healthcare, business, technology, entertainment and global affairs with an unwavering commitment to truth. Our team of dedicated journalists and experts works relentlessly to challenge narratives, expose realities, and hold power accountable.At The Media Times, we don’t just report the news—we shape conversations, spark change, and empower the public with knowledge.
Hindi 
English